Introduction This study was conducted in light of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, which brought UK dentistry to a standstill . The market has seen a recent influx of unproven extraoral scavengers (EOSs), which claim to reduce the risk of particulate spread.Aims To investigate the efficacy of a commercially available EOS device on contamination reduction during dental aerosol generating procedures (AGPs). The secondary aim was to investigate differences between open and closed dental operatories.Method Dental procedures were simulated on a dental manikin using citric acid (10 %) added to the water lines with universal indicating paper (UIP) placed in strategic locations in the operatory, on the clinician and assistant . Chromatic change related to settling of splatter containing citric acid on the UIP was analysed to calculate percentage intensity of splatter contamination.Results EOSs resulted in 20% reduction in frequency and 75% reduction in mean intensity of contamination of operatory sites . There was a 33% and 76% reduction in mean intensity contamination for clinician and assistant, respectively . Use of rubber dam and four-handed dentistry resulted in further reduction.Discussion This exploratory study demonstrates contamination by splatter in a simulated dental setting . The concern in dentistry regarding aerosol requires further quantitative investigation of smaller particles.Conclusions The routine use of four-handed dentistry and rubber dam should continue where possible to maximise risk mitigation during AGPs . However, on the basis of our findings, the use of an EOS device can further mitigate the magnitude and concentration of splatter.