Authors: Neal Baer Published on:
2020
Publication:
Perspectives in biology and medicine;63(3):480-493 DOI:
10.1353/pbm.2020.0035
Science is facing a turbulent backlash in which it is often viewed as "just another opinion" among many competing unscientifically backed anecdotes. In these unprecedented times of the COVID-19 pandemic, when guidance from public health epidemiologists and administrators is critical, it is incumbent on all of us to consider how we can use data to tell emotionally compelling stories aimed at improving public health. When informing the public about COVID-19 and other pressing public health issues, the author argues that we must begin with emotionally captivating stories, grounded in science. Supporting this approach is the work of psychologist Paul Slovic, who has shown that human beings are not only hard-wired to be story-driven, but that we are not, in general, moved by data. The challenge, then, is to tell emotionally captivating stories supported by data, especially in these divisive times.
Article Analysis: --
No tags are applied.
No tags found.
Additional Information
Journal:
Journal Article
Source:
PubMed: 33416621
issn_isbn:
1529-8795
Country:
United States
Language:
eng
article_id: 563687
More Info | #563687: Science Is Just Another Opinion: Making Medical Stories Count Post-COVID-19.
View PDF / Links: (#563687Science Is Just Another Opinion: Making Medical Stories Count Post-COVID-19.)